The following argument is valid:
- (Premise) Every reasonable desire can be fulfilled.
- (Premise) The desire for moral perfection is reasonable.
- (Premise) Moral perfection requires being such that one is morally responsible and yet cannot do wrong.
- (Premise) If naturalism is true, a state that entails moral responsibility and an inability to do wrong is not attainable.
- Therefore, naturalism is false.
The argument being valid, the question is whether it is sound.
« The Assembling of the Church | “To the church in…” suggests unity as opposed to exclusion | Main | Revolutionaries? « Being Missional »
10/01/2009
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Comments